Wednesday, January 12, 2011

rebuttal to broken window fallacy

It's easy enough to dispense with this by simply mentioning public goods,
i.e. goods with high social value that, because of market failure, will not be produced without government
intervention. Producing these goods is just the opposite of "throwing towels on the floor," and the net benefits from these projects are particularly high now since input costs have fallen so much as the economy has weakened. There are other easy counterarguments as well, but rather than rehashing those, I want to play the window game.


Suppose there is an economy that is humming along at full employment. Then, all of a sudden, out of nowhere, a giant, extremely rare windstorm - it's like nothing anyone can remember - comes along
and blows out many of the windows in town's homes and businesses. The windows are broken.

This is
unfortunate. The town specializes in delicate goods that cannot be exposed to
the weather, and when the windows were broken and the weather rushed in all of the inventory, or much of
it anyway, was destroyed. In addition, since all of the town's wealth was
invested in the inventory, and then some (i.e. they had borrowed to finance some
of the inventory), the people of the town lost both their wealth and their
ability to borrow from residents of other towns.


So they are wiped out. With all of their wealth gone and no way to borrow, there
is no way to rebuild the town and go on as before. Most people are struggling
just to get by each day, they don't have time to repair the windows, let
alone the resources to finance the repairs and then restock the shelves.


Or maybe there is a way. Suppose the government steps in and hires people to
replace the broken windows, and then makes loans as needed (or makes loan guarantees, with an appropriate allowance for risk, or even outright grants in some cases)
to recapitalize the businesses and cover the cost of the repairs. That way, the business owners can purchase new inventory and go
on as before (well, not exactly as before, one condition of the government loan
is that windows of a certain strength are installed, by regulation if necessary,
so that the government financed inventory is safe from another disaster).


Thus, instead of destroying wealth, the government is essential in creating
it. After the economy-wide window disaster, the government ignores the advice to turn its back in a time of need, and instead steps in and provides the help
that is needed to get the economy up and running again. Because of the government action, the economy is revived, and
they all live happily ever after.

Wednesday, January 05, 2011

Lost Balance: Were Is The Anger? � Real-World Economics Review Blog

Lost Balance: Were Is The Anger? Real-World Economics Review Blog: "The more naked the capitalism the more unequal the income."
English (auto-detected) » English

English (auto-detected) » English

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Downsides of Growth « Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy

this is from richard daly's website. I also have been looking into Marc Lavoie and Georgescu-Roegen.

Uneconomic Growth

Continuing to grow the economy when the costs are higher than the benefits is actually uneconomic growth.  The United Nations has classified five types of uneconomic growth:

  • jobless growth, where the economy grows, but does not expand opportunities for employment;
  • ruthless growth, where the proceeds of economic growth mostly benefit the rich;
  • voiceless growth, where economic growth is not accompanied by extension of democracy or empowerment;
  • rootless growth, where economic growth squashes people’s cultural identity; and
  • futureless growth, where the present generation squanders resources needed by future generations.

The downsides of economic growth can be avoided by maintaining an optimal scale of the economy.

All In The Mind - About

Special Features

Dialogue with the Dalai Lama Part 1 of 3

Download Audio

Dalai Lama

From the stage of the 2009 Mind and Its Potential conference, His Holiness the Dalai Lama joins All in the Mind's Natasha Mitchell in an extended conversation about the mind, science and much else. And, joining the dialogue in Parts 2 and 3 is the founder of the field of positive psychology Martin Seligman, leading Harvard evolutionary biologist Marc Hauser, and Buddhist scholar Alan Wallace.

Broadcast: 5 December 2009 | more details...


Dialogue with the Dalai Lama Part 2 of 3

Download Audio

Dalai Lama

His Holiness the Dalai Lama joins All in the Mind's Natasha Mitchell and leading scholars in a dialogue about science, wellbeing and our moral minds. In Part 2 Harvard evolutionary biologist and author of Moral Minds Marc Hauser asks: does biology constrain our mind's potential and our moral capacity? Is there a place for moral outrage? Next week, founder of the field of positive psychology Martin Seligman and Buddhist scholar Alan Wallace join the fray.

Broadcast: 12 December 2009 | more details...


Dialogue with the Dalai Lama Part 3 of 3

Download Audio

Dalai Lama

His Holiness the Dalai Lama joins All in the Mind's Natasha Mitchell and leading scholars in a dialogue about science and the self. In Part 3, founder of the field of positive psychology Martin Seligman and Buddhist scholar Alan Wallace consider with him what it takes to flourish...really flourish...individually and collectively.

Broadcast: 19 December 2009 | more details...


hooray.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Neologism of the Day

I skipped over this the first time I read it. A second later it hit me. Which Court?

"Congress had no authority, and even the Supine Court was unlikely to intervene in well settled real estate law" [src: naked capitalism]